Indiana

  Drug Litigation.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
February 27, 2010
Drug-Litigation
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Drug Litigation News

 

FDA Cannot Approve Subsequently Submitted ANDAs For The Same Drug

In some circumstances, an applicant who obtains 180-day exclusivity may be the sole marketer of a generic competitor to the innovator product for 180 days. But 180-day exclusivity can begin to run -- with a court decision -- even before an applicant has received approval for its ANDA. In that case, some, or all of the 180-day period, could expire without the ANDA applicant marketing its generic drug. Conversely, if there is no court decision and the first applicant does not begin commercial marketing of the generic drug, there may be prolonged or indefinite delays in the beginning of the first applicant's 180-day exclusivity period. Approval of an ANDA has no effect on exclusivity, except if the sponsor begins to market the approved generic drug. Until an eligible ANDA applicant's 180-day exclusivity period has expired, FDA cannot approve subsequently submitted ANDAs for the same drug. This is true even if the later ANDAs are otherwise ready for approval and the sponsors are willing to begin marketing immediately. Therefore, an ANDA applicant who is eligible for exclusivity can often delay all generic competition for the innovator product.

Only an ANDA containing a paragraph IV certification may be eligible for exclusivity. If an applicant changes from a paragraph IV certification to a paragraph III certification, for example, upon losing its patent infringement litigation, the ANDA will no longer be eligible for exclusivity.

The 180-day exclusivity provision has been the subject of considerable litigation and administrative review in recent years, as the courts, industry, and FDA have sought to interpret it in a way that is consistent both with the statutory text and with the legislative goals underlying the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. A series of Federal court decisions beginning with the 1998 Mova case describe acceptable interpretations of the 180-day exclusivity provision, identify potential problems in implementing the statute, and establish certain principles to be used by the Agency in interpreting the statute. As described in a June 1998 guidance for industry, FDA currently is addressing on a case-by-case basis those 180-day exclusivity issues not addressed by existing regulations.

Contact our Indiana Drug Litigation Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Some prescription drugs are addictive
Prescription medications such as pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives are very useful treatment tools but sometimes people do not take them as directed and may become addicted.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Drug Litigation cases in Indiana and nationwide:

Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools Convenes First Advisory Committee Meeting
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools Convenes First Advisory Committee Meeting

Mental health and wellness experts, educati...

Read more >


Drugs Into The U.S. Marketplace
It will focus in particular on whether certain "later-listed" patents or inappropriate patent submissions by the sponsors of innovator drug product...
Read more >


The Formulation, Composition, Or Method Of Using An Approved Drug
Only certain types of patent information can be submitted to FDA. FDA publishes patent information on approved drug products in the Agency's public...
Read more >


More Drug Litigation News >

 
 

Drug Litigation Terms

 


Today's Terms

Therapeutic Equivalence (TE)

Definition:
Drug products classified as therapeutically equivalent can be substituted with the full expectation that the substituted product will produce the same clinical effect and safety profile as the prescribed product.

Pharmaceutical Equivalents

Definition:
FDA considers drug products to be pharmaceutical equivalents if they meet these three criteria: they contain the same active ingredient(s), they are of the same dosage form and route of administration and they are identical in strength or concentration.

RLD (Reference Listed Drug)

Definition:
A Reference Listed Drug is an approved drug product to which new generic versions are compared to show that they are bioequivalent.

More Drug Litigation Terms >

 

Drug Litigation Resources

 


Search Drug Litigation resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Drug Litigation Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Drug Litigation:

  • Adverse Effects
  • Prescription Drugs
  • Over the Counter Drugs
  • Drug Recalls
  • Dosage Errors
  • Drug Company Liability
  • Drug Company Negligence
  • More Drug Litigation Topics >

    Indiana Drug Litigation Attorney

     
    If you live in the following cities and need an Drug Litigation attorney you should contact our Drug Litigation Attorney as soon as possible:

    • Bloomington
    • Brownsburg
    • Carmel
    • Columbus
    • Connersville
    • Crawfordsville
    • Crown Point
    • East Chicago
    • Elkhart
    • Evansville
    • Fishers
    • Fort Wayne
    • Franklin
    • Goshen
    • Granger
    • Greenfield
    • Greenwood
    • Hobart
    • Huntington
    • Indianapolis
    • Jeffersonville
    • Kokomo
    • La Porte
    • Lafayette
    • Logansport
    • Marion
    • Martinsville
    • Merrillville
    • Michigan City
    • Mishawaka
    • Muncie
    • New Albany
    • New Castle
    • Newburgh
    • Noblesville
    • Peru
    • Plainfield
    • Portage
    • Richmond
    • Seymour
    • Shelbyville
    • South Bend
    • Terre Haute
    • Valparaiso
    • Vincennes
    • West Lafayette
     


    Legal Disclaimers
    All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Indiana Drug Litigation.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

    Local Professional? Generate new business today
    Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


    This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
    ©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.